HOME /

Publications

1994
for Moen, Jan. Guidelines. “Moen, Jan. Guidelines for Metering and Settlements of Electricity Trade. 5 November 1994. Draft.” In, 1994.Abstract
Moen, Jan. Guidelines for Metering and Settlements of Electricity Trade. 5 November 1994. Draft.
Moen, Jan. Untitled Draft. “Moen, Jan. Untitled Draft Presentation on the Deregulation of the Norwegian Electricity Market. 27 October 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
Moen, Jan. Untitled Draft Presentation on the Deregulation of the Norwegian Electricity Market. 27 October 1994.
Resources, Norwegian Water. “Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Administration. Guidelines for System Responsibility in the Electrical Power System. December 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Administration. Guidelines for System Responsibility in the Electrical Power System. December 1994.
Resources, Norwegian Water. “Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Administration. Guidelines for Metering and Settlements of Electricity Trade. 5 November 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Administration. Guidelines for Metering and Settlements of Electricity Trade. 5 November 1994.
of Reg, Office Electricity. “Office of Electricity Regulation (UK). Decision on a Monopolies and Mergers Commission Reference. February 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
Office of Electricity Regulation (UK). Decision on a Monopolies and Mergers Commission Reference. February 1994.
of Reg, Office Electricity. “Office of Electricity Regulation (UK). Report on Trading Outside the Pool. July 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
Office of Electricity Regulation (UK). Report on Trading Outside the Pool. July 1994.
of Reg, Office Electricity. “Office of Electricity Regulation (UK). The Supply Price Control: Proposals 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
Office of Electricity Regulation (UK). The Supply Price Control: Proposals 1994.
of Ent, Office State Owned. “Office of State Owned Enterprises, Department of the Treasury (Australia). Reforming Victoria's Electricity Industry: A Competitive Future for Electricity - A Summary of Reforms. December 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
Office of State Owned Enterprises, Department of the Treasury (Australia). Reforming Victoria's Electricity Industry: A Competitive Future for Electricity - A Summary of Reforms. December 1994.
of Pr, Government Alberta. “Proposed Changes to Electric Industry Will Help Keep Consumers Down.” In, 1994.Abstract
Government of Alberta. Proposed Changes to Electric Industry Will Help Keep Consumers Down. 18 October 1994. News Release, 6 pages.
alberta_changes_101894.pdf
Rudnick, Hugh. Competitio. “Rudnick, Hugh. Competition, Coordination, and Transmission Pricing: Open Access in Chile. 27-28 October 1994. Draft.” In, 1994.Abstract
Rudnick, Hugh. Competition, Coordination, and Transmission Pricing: Open Access in Chile. 27-28 October 1994. Draft.
Rudnick, Hugh, Rodrigo Pa. “Rudnick, Hugh, Rodrigo Palma and Jos FernÌÁndez. Marginal Pricing and Supplement Cost Allocation in Transmission Open Access (Chile). 3 May 1994. IEEE Power Engineering Society Paper No. 94 SM 528-0 PWRS.” In, 1994.Abstract
Rudnick, Hugh, Rodrigo Palma and Jos FernÌÁndez. Marginal Pricing and Supplement Cost Allocation in Transmission Open Access (Chile). 3 May 1994. IEEE Power Engineering Society Paper No. 94 SM 528-0 PWRS.
Commission, Swedish Energy. “Swedish Energy Commission. Summary of the Electricity Market in Change Proposal SOU 1994(14): pp. 16-23.” In, 1994.Abstract
Swedish Energy Commission. Summary of the Electricity Market in Change Proposal SOU 1994(14): pp. 16-23.
Burns,, and Mark Eifert. “"A Cooperative Approach Toward Resolving Electric Transmission Jurisdictional Disputes The Regulatory Alliances".” In, 1994.Abstract
Burns, Robert, and Mark Eifert. A Cooperative Approach Toward Resolving Electric Transmission Jurisdictional Disputes. NRRI 94-06, The National Regulatory Research Institute, March 1994. Excerpt: The Regulatory Alliances,‰Û pp. 22 ‰ÛÒ 26.
burns_regalliance_march1994.pdf
Massey, William. “Massey, William. RTG's State/Federal Cooperation Draft Presentation. 11 February 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
Massey, William. RTG's State/Federal Cooperation Draft Presentation. 11 February 1994.
McDiarmid, Robert. “McDiarmid, Robert. The Role of the Courts in Emerging Electricity Policy. Draft. 13 October 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
McDiarmid, Robert. The Role of the Courts in Emerging Electricity Policy. Draft. 13 October 1994.
v, Cajun Electric Power Cooperative. “Opinion, No. 92-1461.” In, 1994.Abstract
Cajun Electric Power Cooperative v. FERC. Opinion, No. 92-1461, US Appeals Court, D.C. 12 July 1994.
cajun_electric_ferc_1994.pdf
Pierce, Richard. “Pierce, Richard. FERC vs. State Jurisdiction Over Transmission Lines, Transactions, and Rates. Draft. February 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
Pierce, Richard. FERC vs. State Jurisdiction Over Transmission Lines, Transactions, and Rates. Draft. February 1994.
Pierce, Richard. “Pierce, Richard. Regulatory Decision-Making Reform. Draft. April 1994.” In, 1994.Abstract
Pierce, Richard. Regulatory Decision-Making Reform. Draft. April 1994.
Costello, Kenneth, and Wayne Olson. “Proposed Alternative Rate Plan for an Electric Utility.” In, 1994.Abstract
Costello, Kenneth and Wayne Olson. Proposed Alternative Rate Plan for an Electric Utility. NRRI/Maine PUC Case No. 92-345. November 1994, 57 pages.
costello_olson_11.94.pdf
Brown, Ashley. “Some Thoughts on State-Federal Jurisdictional Issues in Transmission, and the Transition to a Competitive Electricity Market.” In, 1994.Abstract
The debate on the issue of pricing transmission services, indeed transmission policy in
general, is characterized by a massive cognitive dissonance. FERC issues a lengthy series of
significant questions about just about everything a federal regulator would ever want to know about
transmission, except for how they relate to the other set of regulators who have so much to say
about the grid. Other than a passing reference, that question did not get asked at all. Thus we are
involved in a debate where most of the discussion takes place in a forum that is responsible for
significantly less than half the revenue that's derived from transmission. Moreover, the regulators
that are responsible for the bulk of transmission revenues set them as part of bundled retail rates
and rarely, if ever, think about transmission in discrete terms. Accordingly, we not only have
cognitive dissonance as to the forum and the substance, but we have decision-makers making critical
decisions who simply do not think about what their peers may be doing, except to the extent that
state regulators worry about FERC preemption of their authority, and FERC fears that state
regulators are actually monopolists who intend to impede all competition. Beyond that, there is
not much dialogue. Given this state of affairs, it seems unlikely that coherent transmission policies
will emerge in the absence of a more formal system of cooperation.
brown_thoughts_jan1994.pdf

Pages